- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22994/2017
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (TWAD), RSW Division, Madurai. Dated : 29.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.19309 to 19311 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.524 and 1519 of 2018 D.Sathiskumar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (TWAD), RSW Division, Madurai. 2.M.Rajadevi .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus by calling the records in Letter No. CO. Canteen/Iva-A/2017/ dated 08.12.2017 and consequently direct to the 1st respondent to issue the tender award order to the petitioner for running in 1st respondent office premises for the year 2017 - 2018. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Palmurugan For R1 : Mr.B.Vijayakarthikeyan Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.T.Sivanathan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.