VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Selin Selvarani v. The Post Master General

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23227/2017

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to reimburse the amount deposited by the petitioners as sought through their representation, dated 09.10.2017 along with 12% interest per annum to the petitioners.

2.Today(16.06.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners by circulating a communication issued by the Superintendent of POs, Dindigul Division, dated 04.01.2023 submits that the claims preferred by the petitioners have already been settled and hence nothing survives in this writ petition.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the above communication, dated

04.01.2023, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

16.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn To

1.The Post Master General, Madura Region, B.B.Kulam, Madurai District.

2.The Superintendent of Post Office, Dindigul Head Post Office, Dindigul District. B.PUGALENDHI, J vrn W.P(MD) No.23227 of 2017

16.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2023 CORAM : THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD) No.23227 of 2017 1.A.Selin Selvarani 2.A.Anthony Arulsamy 3.Sebasthiammal 4.Mercy 5.S.Velankanni 6.J.Emelmary 7.Jayamary 8.M.Amutha 9.Vincent Paulmarry 10.Amalorpavam 11.M.Muthukannu 12.A.Lois Tony 13.Kulanthaitherasu 14.Saverimuthuraja 15.Arulsamy 16.M.Suganya 17.Innaciammal 18.M.Veluchamy 19.Kulanthai 20.V.Anthoniammal 21.John Britto 22.V.Raju Petitioners Vs. 1.The Post Master General, Madura Region, B.B.Kulam, Madurai District. 2.The Superintendent of Post Office, Dindigul Head Post Office, Dindigul District. 3.A.Sivaperumal Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to reimburse the amount deposited by the petitioners as sought through their representation, dated 09.10.2017 along with 12% interest per annum to the petitioners. For Petitioner :Mr.A.Arul Jenifer For R1 & R2 :Mr.S.Jeyasingh Central Government Standing Counsel For R3 :Mr.K.Manikandan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.