VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.M.Yoonus v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 June 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24096/2017

Judgment

ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that without his consent and without his knowledge, his LCO was changed from his name to the third respondent's name and with this allegation, the petitioner has made a representation on

13.11.2017 to the official respondents. Alleging that no action has been taken on the said representation, he has filed this writ petition.

2.The allegation made in this writ petition is quite serious, however, it has not been disputed by the official respondents by filing any counter affidavit.

3.In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated

13.11.2017 and pass appropriate orders, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall also furnish a copy of the representation dated 13.11.2017 along with a copy of this order to the first respondent. No costs. Index :

28.06.2023 NCC : gk

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

28.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI A.M.Yoonus ... Petitioner v. 1.The Managing Director, Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Dugar Towers, 34(123), 6th Floor, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 3.A.Mohadeer Mohamed ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 to conduct an enquiry of the petitioner's name being changed illegally by misrepresentation in LCO.No.18693 in favour of the third respondent and consequently, reallot the LCO in the petitioner's name based on the petitioner's representation dated 13.11.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For Respondents : Mr.David Sundar Singh, Standing Counsel for R.1, R.2 No appearance for R.3 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.