VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Janagarani, v. The District Level Vigilance

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 August 2023
Bench
The Chief Justice, P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 25/2017

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that after filing of the Writ Petition, the respondent Police has conducted an enquiry and closed the same. In view of that, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief claimed now does not survive.

¶2In the light of that, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.(MD)No.18 of 2017 is closed. [S.V.G., CJ.] [P.V.M., J.] Index : Yes / No

28.08.2023 smn2 To

1.The Chairman and District Collector, District Level Vigilance Committee, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railways, Divisional Office, Personnel Branch, Madurai.

3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tuticorin. W.P.(MD)No.25eofe2017 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and

P.VADAMALAI, J. smn2 DATED : 28.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2023 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and W.M.P.(MD)No.18 of 2017 K.Janagarani ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Level Vigilance Committee, Rep. by its Chairman and District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 2.The Southern Railways, Rep. by its Divisional Personnel Officer, Divisional Office, Personnel Branch, Madurai. 3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tuticorin. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the communication, dated 19.12.2016 of the third respondent, quash the order passed therein and consequently, forbear the respondents from verifying the community status of the petitioner in the light of the favourable finding already arrived at by the competent authority viz., the first respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali for Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan For Respondent Nos.1 & 3 : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.