Arul Raj v. The District Revenue Officer

O R D E R Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments after filing this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

26.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No RM To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai.

2.The Sub Collector cum Divisional Authority, Devakottai.

3.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. RM (1/2)

26.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P(MD)No.206 of 2017 Arul Raj ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai. 2.The Sub Collector cum Divisional Authority, Devakottai. 3.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.A6/22659/2016 dated 30.11.2016 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan for M/s.Chettinad Legal Solutions For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj, Special Government Pleader