VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Sankili v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 20250/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/11/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN M.Sankili

... Petitioner/Accused No.2

Vs State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Perungudi Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.111 of 2023 . ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.RAJASEKARAN , Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.K.SAKTHI KUMAR, Government Advocate (Crl.Side). PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.111 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/ accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 392 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.111 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as a Chief Protection Officer. On 02.07.2023, when the defacto complainant's employees were returning from Kanchirangulam Colony, the petitioner along with the other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.500 and also threatened them with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to comply any stringent condition that may be imposed by the Court.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that when the defacto complainant's employees were returning from Kanchirangulam Colony, the petitioner along with the other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.500 and also tried to rob the mobile phone.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances and also the fact that the earlier anticipatory bail applications filed by the petitioner were dismissed, I find no change of circumstances in this case. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/-

09/11/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/11/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. INDU TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUNGUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.20250 of 2023 Date :09/11/2023 SA/SKN/SAR. /30.11.2023/3P/3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.