- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26721/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents.
¶2The petitioner wants to cancel the sale deed executed by the respondents 6 and 7 in favour of the eigth respondent vide Document No. 4547/2022 dated 14.10.2022. He invokes Section 77-A of the Registration Act, 1908. The scope and applicability of the pending consideration is before the Larger Bench. The petitioner has to necessarily await its decision. The third respondent will take a call in the matter based on the decision of the Larger Bench.
¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
07.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To
1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 28.
2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Integrated Complex of Registration Department, TNAC Nagar, Rajakampeeram, Y.Othakkadai, Madurai District – 107.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
3.The District Registrar, The District Registrar Office Dindigul, Collectorate Campus, Dindigul – 04.
4.The Sub Registrar, Nilakottai Sub Registrar Office, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. and W.M.P(MD)No.22982 of 2023 \
07.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.22982 of 2023 Meena ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 28. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Integrated Complex of Registration Department, TNAC Nagar, Rajakampeeram, Y.Othakkadai, Madurai District – 107. 3.The District Registrar, The District Registrar Office Dindigul, Collectorate Campus, Dindigul – 04. 4.The Sub Registrar, Nilakottai Sub Registrar Office, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. 5.Leelavathi 6.Manimekala 7.Manimala 8.Chinnamayan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to cancel the sale deed executed by the 6th and 7th respondents in favour of the 8th respondent vide Document No. 4547/2022 dated 14.10.2022 by considering the representation dated 31.10.2022 made by the petitioner to the respondents 1 to 4. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sankarapandian For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R.1 to R.4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.