S.Nithya, v. T.Venkatesh,

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] When the contempt petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent contemnor submitted that as per the directions issued by this Court, notice was issued, which was also questioned by way of writ petition before this Court in W.P.(MD) No.1749/2023. Therefore, the direction could not be complied with. However, when the writ petition was dismissed by this Court on 31.01.2023, encroachment has been removed and consequently a direction of this Court has also been complied with.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would also submit that the encroachments have been removed.

¶3Contemnor has also filed a reply affidavit, wherein, in Paragraph No.7, he has stated that the encroachments have been removed on 28.01.2023.

¶4In the light of the above, this contempt petition is closed.

[T.R., A.C.J.] [D.K.K., J.]

02.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

RR/VSM THEoHON'BLEoTHEoCHIEFoJUSTICE and oD.KRISHNAKUMARoo,oJo. RR/VSM Cont.P.(MD)No.1903oofo2022

02.02.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR S.Nithya ... Petitioner -vs- T.Venkatesh The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Thiruppathur Sivagangai. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/3rd respondent herein for the act of contempt committed by him wilfully disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.21819/2022 dated 15.09.2022 For Petitioner : M/s.K.Pandipriya For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader