- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 2273/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Court on an earlier occasion directed the Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's application. The petitioner's application has been rejected. The petitioner has to question the same.
¶2With this liberty to the petitioner, the contempt petition is closed.
05.12.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi To The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. Cont. P(MD)No.2273 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.17117 of 2022
05.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
Cont. P(MD)No.2273 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.2273 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.17117 of 2022 Vanitha ... Petitioner Vs. S.Vijayalakshmi, The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / 3rd respondent herein for having committed contempt of Court by disobeying the order dated 24.11.2022 made in W.P.(MD)No.17117 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muniasamy For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader Cont. P(MD)No.2273 of 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.