- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 2375/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Since the issue concerns under Section 77A of the Registration Act, the respondent cannot pass any order. The respondent has to abide by the outcome of the Hon'ble Larger Bench judgment. This contempt petition is closed.
04.12.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To: The District Registrar, Periyakulam Registrar Office, Periyakulam, Theni District. 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2375 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU CONT.P.(MD)No.2375 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.28323 of 2022
04.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2375 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN CONT.P.(MD)No.2375 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.28323 of 2022 Ramachandran ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Bhoopathi, District Registrar, Periyakulam Registrar Office, Periyakulam, Theni District. ... Contemnor / Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor / respondents and punish her for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.28323 of 2022 dated 23.12.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Arun For Respondent : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate. * * * 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2375 OF 2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.