- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 20059/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the Petitioner and her family members without following the due process of law under the guise of enquiry based on her representation dated 03.11.2023.
¶2Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent herein, enquiry was undertaken. He further submitted that it is a issue over money transaction.
¶3Let the respondents close the complaint by advising the parties to work out remedy through civil process.
¶4With this direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
08.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
pnn
08.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Panaiyammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District. 3.Sankar ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2nd Respondent NOT TO HARASS the Petitioner and her family members without following the due process of law under the guise of enquiry based on her representation dated 03.11.2023. For Petitioner : Mr. C.Susikumar for Subash Law Office For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.