- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26932/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.The respondent is directed to conclude the petition mentioned enquiry proceedings on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, on notice before passing final order. It is open to the respondent to pass order one way or the other.
3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
09.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
09.11.2023 (2/2)
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Arulmigu Jayamkonda Choleeswar Soundranayagi Amman Temple, Rep. by its Trustee, M.Arunachalam Chettiar. ... Petitioner Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to complete the enquiry proceedings based on the application submitted by the petitioner temple dated 21.09.23 within reasonable time. For Petitioner : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.