- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26834/2023
Judgment
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Advocate General assisted by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.
¶2This writ petition came to be filed since the petitioner was apprehensive that the tender / auction process may be vitiated by any irregularities.
¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing today, it has been stated that the process is going on without any hassle. I am of the view that nothing survives for further adjudication. This writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To The District Collector, Pudukkottai District Collectorate, Pudukkottai.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
16.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.23069 of 2023 S.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District Collectorate, Pudukkottai. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to conduct the Tender notified in Na.Ka.No.611/2022 (Pu.Ma.Su) dated 18.10.2023 only through online tendering process, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 02.11.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajarajan For Respondent : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.