- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1912/2022
Judgment
O R D E R This Contempt petition is filed alleging the order, dated 11.06.2019, passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.13067 of 2019, is not complied with. CONT P(MD)No.1912 of 2022 S.SRIMATHY, J. ksa
¶2By order, dated 11.06.2019, this Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders. The respondents have passed an order on 22.07.2021, rejecting the claim of the petitioner. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petiitoner submitted that the similarly placed persons were granted relief, but, the petitioner was discriminated. However, such type of arguments cannot be made in a Contempt petition.
¶3Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order, dated 22.07.2021.
24.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ksa CONT. P(MD)No.1912 of 2022
Case details
Parties and counsel
CONT P(MD)No.1912 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CONT P(MD)No.1912 of 2022 In W.P.(MD).No.13067 of 2019 A.Boothaanatha Pillai ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. Mr.Shiv Das Meena, I.A.S., The Additional Chief Secretary, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort Saint George, Chennai. ... Contemnor/Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnor/Respondent for willful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P(MD)No.13067 of 2019 dated 11.06.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss For Respondents : Mr.S.R.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.