VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kathir v. The Inspector of Police

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 20236/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/11/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. VADAMALAI

¶1Kathir,

¶2Manikandan,

¶3Arunkumar @ Konar Arun,

¶4Murugan,

¶5Sathishkumar,

¶6Vijay @ Vijayakumar,

¶7Saravana Kumar,

¶8Naga Arujun,

¶9Vengat @ Vengateswaran,

¶10Mathankumar,

¶11Raja, ... Petitioners/Accused Rank not known

Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Kamuthi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (In Crime No.306 of 2023) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.A.Balaji, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman,

Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.306/2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 353 and 506(ii) of IPC and r/w 3(1) Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, in Crime No.306 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 28.10.2023, at about 09.50 p.m, the petitioners along with the other accused waylaid the Government Bus and threw the stone to the mirror of the bus and caused damages to the said bus. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case and also submitted that co-accused was arrested and thereafter released on bail by the learned Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram and he prays for granting anticipatory bail.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioners have broken the government bus mirror, its worth about Rs.25,000/-. He further submitted that no previous case is pending against the petitioners.

¶5Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the grant of bail to the co-accused and also considering the antecedents of the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix his photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) each, to the credit of crime No.306 of 2023 without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt / acknowledgment before the concerned Court while executing sureties; [c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [d]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [f]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/-

09/11/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/11/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. tta TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶4THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.20236 of 2023 Date :09/11/2023 RK/VRS(24/11/2023) 6P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.