- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 26972/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2The petitioner's grievance has been redressed. In view of the subsequent development, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Collector/Inspector of Panchayat, Karur, Karur District.
2.The Block Development Officer, Thanthoni Panchayat Union, Karur District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.23165 of 2023 S.Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector/Inspector of Panchayat, Karur, Karur District. 2.The Block Development Officer, Thanthoni Panchayat Union, Karur District. 3.The Village Panchayat President, Andangkovil West Panchayat, Thanthoni Panchayat Union, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to prohibit the 3rd respondent from carrying construction of drainage channel permanently at the jurisdiction of Andangkovil East Panchayat, Thanthoni Panchayat Union, Karur District without getting permission from the 1st respondent and Andangkovil East Panchayat council within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah For Respondents : Mr.Veerakathiravan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.