Maheswaran. R v. The District Registrar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2.

¶2On going through the averments set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, I am more than convinced that a private dispute involving R3 & R4 is sought to be given a different color. As rightly pointed out by the learned Additional Government Pleader, the writ Court cannot grant any relief. The petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional civil court for appropriate relief.

¶3Granting such liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

16.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Registrar, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Sub-Registrar, Aathur Sub-Registration Office, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

16.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN R.Maheswaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Aathur Sub-Registration Office, Dindigul District. 3.M.Vijayalakshmi 4.M.Jayalakshmi 5.M.Deepa ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondent to cancel the sale deed Doc.No.938 of 2023 dated 03.05.2023 executed by the 3rd and 4th respondents in favour of 5th respondent, registered at the office of 2nd respondent, and consequently, directing the 2nd respondent to register the sale deed dated 12.12.2022 executed by the 3rd and 4th respondents in favour of the petitioner, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 28.10.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sankar For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2