VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Pragathi v. The Commissioner of Police

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 27022/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the third respondent.

¶2The petitioner wants to sell crackers. She needs temporary license for the same. The petitioner had earlier filed writ petition before this Court and pursuant to the direction given by this Court, the Commissioner of Madurai Corporation had issued trade receipt also. The only reason why the impugned order has been passed by the first respondent is that the trade receipt has not been furnished. Now the trade receipt is available. The impugned order can no longer survive. Hence it is set aside. The first respondent is directed to issue license to the petitioner.

¶3This writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

09.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA Note: Issue order copy on 09.11.2023. To

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City,

2.The District Fire Officer, Fire and Rescue Services, Madurai District,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

3.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation,

09.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Pragathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, 2.The District Fire Officer, Fire and Rescue Services, Madurai District, 3.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in C.No. 45968/133/V2/2023-24 dated 06.11.2023 passed by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to issue license for running Temporary Cracker Shop at No.35, Ramyapuliyadi, Thimma, Eswari, Kutty Vakaiyara Dharma Trust, Moondrumavadi, K.Pudur, Madurai to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.Subash babu Senior Counsel for M/s.Subash Law Office For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate for R.1 Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R.2 Mr.K.K.Kannan Standing Counsel for R.3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.