VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Duraisamy v. The Executive Engineer

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
Hemant Chandangoudarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 27130/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

O R D E R

¶1The petitioner is before this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order dated 04.11.2023 issued by the second respondent, whereby the petitioner's application for grant of temporary electricity service connection for the purpose of construction of a house was rejected on the ground that the writ petition filed by the fifth respondent in W.P.(MD) No.2394 of 2023 is pending consideration before this Court.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the property of the fifth respondent is situated on the eastern side, whereas the proposed pole is to be erected on the western side. He further submitted that he has no objection to the respondent authorities proceeding with the erection of the pole, and undertook that the pole would not be erected on the property belonging to the fifth respondent and that no dispute would arise with respect to the erection of the pole in the petitioner's property.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent contended that W.P.(MD) No.2394 of 2023, filed by the fifth respondent seeking a direction to the Tahsildar, Vilathikulam Taluk, to take action against the petitioner herein for allegedly obtaining a fake patta transfer order, was disposed of by this Court, vide order dated 07.02.2023, directing the third respondent therein to consider the representation submitted by the fifth respondent herein.

¶4The fifth respondent objected to the grant of temporary service connection to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner had fraudulently obtained patta in respect of an extent of 8 cents belonging to him and that the same has been challenged before the competent authority and is pending consideration. It was further contended that the official respondents, at the instance of the petitioner, are attempting to erect an electrical pole on the property belonging to the fifth respondent.

¶5In view of the above, the impugned order dated 04.11.2023 issued by the second respondent is not legally sustainable and is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 04.11.2023 is set aside. The second respondent is directed to provide a temporary electricity service connection to the petitioner in S.No.240/4A, situated at Kulathur North Village, Vilathikulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District, subject to the petitioner satisfying the requisite criteria, and without erecting any pole on the property belonging to the fifth respondent or on the disputed extent of land measuring 8 cents. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index :Yes / No

12.03.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No gvn To

¶1The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. Thoothukudi

¶2The Junior Engineer Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. Kulathur, Thoothukudi District

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District

¶4The Tahsildar Vilathikulam Taluk Thoothukudi District

¶5The District Revenue Officer, Tuticorin.

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

gvn

12.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.23286 & 23288 of 2023 Duraisamy ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. Thoothukudi 2. The Junior Engineer Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. Kulathur, Thoothukudi District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District 4. The Tahsildar Vilathikulam Taluk Thoothukudi District 5. Karunakaran 6. The District Revenue Officer, Tuticorin. ... Respondents (R6 is suo motu impleaded vide court order dated 22.11.2024 in WP(MD)No 27130 of 2023 by LVGJ) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd Respondent in Ka.No.E Mi Po/Vi Ni/Ku/Ko.Kattu/Ka.No.493/23 dated 04.11.2023 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to grant new electricity service connection in the name of the Petitioner for the constructing house comprised in Survey No.240/4A to an extent of 0.33.0 Hectares, situated at Kulathur North Village, Vilathikulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner :Mr.A.D.Ganeshamoorthi For Respondents :Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel – For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.Kameswaran Govt., Advocate – For R3 & R4 : Mr.M.M.Manivel Pandian – for R5 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.