Sathishkumar.A v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The fourth respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the fourth respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the final order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

16.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul.

3.The Tahsildar, Dindigul Main Road, Natham, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

16.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Sathishkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul. 3.The Tahsildar, Dindigul Main Road, Natham, Dindigul District. 4.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District. (R4 is suo motu impleaded by this Court dated 16.11.2023) ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.10.2023 upon the Registration and Revenue records. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Bhaskar For Respondents : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3