- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 November 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 20668/2023
Judgment
ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to harass the petitioner and his family members in connection with the complaint made by the third respondent on the file of the second respondent Police under the guise of enquiry.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue between the petitioner and second respondent over the construction of the house in the property, which belongs to the petitioner.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, both sides appeared. Finding that the issue between the contractor and the property owner, they were advised to work out their remedy through appropriate civil process. That was accepted by them and gave statement also. With the above said advise, the enquiry was closed.
4.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), nothing survives for further consideration in this petition.
5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
17.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : VSG To
1.The Superintendant of Police, Office of the Superintendant of Police, Madurai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
VSG
17.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendant of Police, Office of the Superintendant of Police, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai District. 3.Rajendran ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to harass the petitioner and his family members in connection with the complaint made by the third respondent on the file of the second respondent Police under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thilagavathi For R1 and 2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.