Mohamed Fathima Rumana A R v. The Authorised Officer

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The Writ Petition on hand has been filed challenging the E-Auction Sale Notice, dated 30.10.2023, issued by the respondent.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that an application has already been filed before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

¶3That being the factum, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue his remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in the manner contemplated.

¶4With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)

15.11.2023

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No SJ

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. SJ

15.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.23418 and 23419 of 2023 A.R.Mohamed Fathima Rumana ... Petitioner Vs. The Authorised Officer, Punjab National Bank, Circle Sastra Centre, PNB House, Trichy - Tanjore Road, Kailasapuram, Trichy – 620 014. ...Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the impugned E-Auction Sale Notice dated 30.10.2023 issued by the respondent, and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalam Azad for M/s.Spicy Law Firm For Respondent : Mr.V.Balasubramani Standing Counsel