Sathyapriya S v. The Tahsildar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The prayer in the writ petition is for conducting survey. It cannot be granted for the present. This is because, the petitioner is not having separate patta in her favour. It is seen that the petitioner had applied to the Tahsildar, Kumbakonam for issuance of separate patta.

¶3The first respondent is directed to hold enquiry and pass an appropriate order on merits after issuing of notice to the co-pattadhars. Final order shall be passed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

20.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office,

2.The Taluk Surveyor,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

20.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Sathyapriya ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, 2.The Taluk Surveyor, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents nos.1 and 2 to measure the petitioner's property comprised in S.No.123/22 situated at Cholapuram Village, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District by considering the petitioner application dated 15.02.2023 within a stipulated time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s.Dhana Law Associates For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader