- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 December 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 20919/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the docket order, dated 11.08.2023 passed in Crl.Appeal SR.No.9510 of 2023, against STC.No.71 of 2022 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur and direct the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Thanjavur to recall non-bailable warrant issued in STC.No.71 of 2022, dated 28.03.2023 and consider the petition for suspension of sentence under Section 389(2) Cr.P.C., on the same day.
¶2The petitioner herein was found guilty for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and thereby, convicted under Section 255(2) Cr.P.C., and he shall undergo sentence of one year Simple Imprisonment. Apart from that the accused was directed to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) as compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C., to the complainant within one month from the date of Judgment, in default, to undergo two months Simple Imprisonment. The default sentence shall run consecutively. At the time of pronouncement of the Judgment, the accused was not present. Hence, Non Bailable Warrant was issued against him.
¶3Later, the petitioner filed the appeal before the Appellate Court viz., Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur and that Memorandum of Appeal was returned stating that the Appeal Memorandum is not maintainable and apart from that, it is also directed that the suspension of sentence must be obtained from the trial Court.
¶4The grievance of the petitioner is that the appeal memorandum is periodically returned without entertaining the same. Repeated returns stating that non bailable warrant was issued at the time of pronouncing Judgment may not be a proper reason. That can be taken into account at the time of hearing the appeal after numbering the same. So that point ought to have been decided on the judicial side. Even without numbering the appeal memorandum returned the same by citing the above said reason may not be proper. So, there will be a direction to the appellate Court to entertain the appeal memorandum and if any clarification is required on the maintainability of the appeal it must be decided on the judicial side.
¶5With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed.
19.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : trp Note: Registry is directed to return the original papers after substituting the xerox copy of the same. To
¶1Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur.
¶2The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Thanjavur G.ILANGOVAN,J trp Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 20919 of 2023 Dated: 19.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 20919 of 2023 M.Abdul Rahim ... Petitioner Vs. L.Senthilkumar ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the docket order, dated 11.08.2023 passed in Crl. Appeal Sr.No.9510 of 2023, against STC.No.71 of 2022 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur and direct the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Thanjavur to recall non-bailable warrant issued in STC.No.71 of 2022,, dated 28.03.2023 and consider the petition for suspension of sentence under Section 389(2) Cr.P.C., on the same day. For Petitioner : Mr.S.A.S.Alaudeen
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.