- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 November 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 21280/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition had been filed to issue a direction to the second respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 02.08.2023.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that only the representation sent by the petitioner was received by the second respondent, so far no complaint has been received as against the petitioner.
3.In view of the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as unnecessary.
27.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No PNM To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai, Pudukkottai District.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Karambakudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
G.ILANGOVAN, J. PNM ORDER IN
27.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Thothakkonar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai, Pudukkottai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Karambakudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 3. Pitchaiammal 4. Chelladurai 5. Balasubramanian 6. Balakrishnan 7. Ramanathan 8. Saravanan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to issue a direction to the R2 not to interfere in civil dispute based on the petitioner's representation, dated 02.08.2023 by following the Rule 562(2)(b) of the TN Police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poornachandran For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1-R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.