Palanichamy v. The Superintending Engineer

O R D E R Heard both sides. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.27666 OF 2023

¶2The petitioner can very well avail the appeal remedy. If the appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, it shall be entertained without any reference to limitation.

¶3The agricultural service connection has already been disconnected. Restoration of the connection will abide by the outcome of the final order to be passed by the appellate authority. As far as the commercial connection is concerned, it shall not be disconnected for a period of four weeks. Whether it should be disconnected or not will abide by the outcome of the interim order to be passed by the appellate authority.

¶4I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. All the contentions and the defences of the petitioner are left open. This writ petitioner stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

23.11.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU Note : Issue order copy on 27.11.2023. 3 W.P.(MD)NO.27666 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.27666 of 2023

23.11.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.27666 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.27666 of 2023 AND W.M.P.(MD)Nos.23771 & 23772 of 2023 Palanichamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Dindigul District. 2. The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Natham, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice issued by the second respondent dated 28.10.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameelarasu For Respondents: Mr.Deenadhayalan, Standing counsel. * * *