- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 November 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 27757/2023
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The order dated 20.10.2023, which seems to be an inter-departmental communication issued by the Tahsildar is sought to be quashed in the present Writ Petition.
2.Admittedly, the proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ) is yet to be issued. The petitioner has not received any notice under Section 7 of the Act. Therefore, this Writ Petition is not entertainable. The respondents are at liberty to issue notice under Section 7 of the Act and after receiving objections from the petitioner, an order under Section 6 of the Act is to be passed for the purpose of proceeding with the removal of encroachment. At the outset, the procedure as contemplated under the Act is to be followed scrupulously.
3.With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)
23.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Yuva To
1.The District Collector, District Collector Campus, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul Revenue Division, Dindigul District.
3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District.
4.The Executive Officer / Panchayat President, Periyakottai Village Panchayat Officer, Dindigul District.
5.The Block Development Officer, Union Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Yuva
23.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.23866 & 23867 of 2023 K.Krishnaveni ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Campus, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul Revenue Division, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District. 4.The Executive Officer / Panchayat President, Periyakottai Village Panchayat Officer, Dindigul District. 5.The Block Development Officer, Union Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.1978/2020/Aa5, dated 20.10.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sankar For Respondents : Mr.S.Kameswaran, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.