A.Rajalakshmi v. The Sub-Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. The second respondent shall put the interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

28.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The Sub Collector, Collector Office, Sivakasi.

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sivakasi.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

28.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Rajalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Sub Collector, Collector Office, Sivakasi. 2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sivakasi. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to issue patta in petitioner favour with respect of the property comprised in Survey No.20/3, Naranapuram Village, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader