M.Ganesan v. The Inspector General of Registration

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner invokes Section 77A of the Registration Act. It has been directed that action can be taken under the said provision only based on the Judgement to be rendered by the Larger Bench. The second respondent shall keep the petitioner's complaint pending. The second respondent will take a call in the matter based on the Judgment to be rendered by the Larger Bench.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

24.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600028.

2.The District Registrar, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Sub Registrar, Thisaiyanvilai, Tirunelveli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

24.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600028. 2.The District Registrar, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Sub Registrar, Thisaiyanvilai, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1 and 2 respondents to cancel the documents bearing numbers 1579/1997 dated 31.12.1997, 755/1998 dated 14.07.1998, 1018/1999 dated 15.09.1999, 684/2009 and 685/2009 dated 11.03.2009 in the office of 3rd respondent on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 15.05.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajaram For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader