- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 27698/2023
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has instructed him not to press this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.11.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To The Commissioner, Thoothukudi City Municipal Corporation, No.113, Palai Road, Thoothukudi District – 628 002.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
28.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.23813 of 2023 M/s.The Tuticorin Spinning Mills Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director Mr.G.Vettivel, 106-G/4, Palayamkottai Road, Thoothukudi – 628 008. ... Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Thoothukudi City Municipal Corporation, No.113, Palai Road, Thoothukudi District – 628 002. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.C5/00319/2022 dated 10.11.2023 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Mohan, Senior Counsel for Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondent : Mr.U.Anandha Kumar Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.