- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 21253/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the respondent to register an FIR against the proposed accused 1 to 3 in the light of the order passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul, dated
07.11.2022 in Cr.M.P.No.18632/2022.
¶2Learned Government Advocate (Crl.) submitted that in pursuance of the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, in Cr.M.P.No.18632/202, dated 07.11.2022, enquiry was conducted. During the course of enquiry, the petitioner was failed to produce relevant documents to show the alleged cheating. Hence the complaint was closed. Closure report was also submitted to the concerned Court on 11.01.2023.
¶3In view of the above submission, let the petitioner be served with another copy of the closure report, so that he can work out remedy through appropriate proceedings before the concerned Court.
¶4With this direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
28.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To
¶1The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
pnn
28.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Paulraj ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent to register an FIR against the proposed accused 1 to 3 in the light of the order passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul, by its order dated 07.11.2022 in Cr.M.P.No.18632/2022 by the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs Govt of U.P. And others on 12.11.2013. Since prima facie case is made out against the proposed accused Nos.1 to 3 which is cognizable/non bailable and to proceed with the investigation independently and fairly without any bias or hindrance. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arockiam For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.