Kanagavalli v. Karthikeyan

O R D E R The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.148 of 2024 on the file of the Sub Court, Virudhunagar District and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Vedasandhur, Dindigul District.

¶2It is evident from the records that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 11.06.2017 and due to their wed-lock, they were blessed with two female children aged about six years and four years; that the elder child is under the care and custody of the respondent and the second child is under the care and custody of the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is residing at Vedasandhur, District and hence, it is very difficult to travel to Virudhunagar to attend all the hearings along with her four year old female child and that therefore, she was constrained to file the present petition.

4.The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the respondent is also taking care of his female child and the case may be transferred to any other place in between Vedasandur and Virudhunagar.

¶5In the case of N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reiterated the position with generally, it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked at while considering the transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant passage is extracted hereunder : "The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.", the bench observed."

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also fact that the petitioner is residing at Vedasandhur and she is taking care of her four years female child, this Court is of the view that the case in H.M.O.P.No.148 of 2024, is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Sub Court, Virudhunagar and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Vedansandur. Accordingly, the learned Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar, is hereby directed to transmit the entire records in H.M.O.P.No.148 of 2024 to the file of the Sub Court, Vedansandur, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receiving the case bundle, the learned Subordinate Judge, Vedasandhur, is directed to take up the petition on file and proceed in accordance with law.

¶7With the above direction, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

02.01.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No das To

1.The Sub Judge, Virudhunagar.

2.The Sub Judge, Vedachandur

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Tr.C.M.P(MD).No.739oofo2024 K.MURALIoSHANKAR,oJ. DAS Orderomadeoino Tr.C.M.Po(MD).No.739oofo2024 and C.M.P(MD)No.17671oofo2024

02.01.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Tr.C.M.P (MD).No.739 of 2024 and C.M.P(MD)No.17671 of 2024 Kanagavalli : Petitioner Vs. Karthikeyan : Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.148 of 2024 on the file of the Sub Court, Virudhunagar District and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Vedasandhur, Dindigul District. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondent : Mr.M.Jothi Basu