Manoharan.S v. The Revenue Divisional Officer (Rdo)

ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent.

2.The writ petitioner states that he is the landlord in respect of the petition mentioned premises and that the tenant is not paying him any rent also. If that be so, the petitioner has to avail his statutory remedy in the manner set out in the statute. Sending representation and seeking its disposal by filing writ petition is not appropriate.

3.I grant liberty to the petitioner to file a formal petition before the first respondent. As and when the same is filed, it shall be disposed of on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four months thereafter. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The contentions and defences of the private respondents are left open.

4.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

29.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Majoharan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2.Lakshmi Praba 3.Vigneshwaran ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to consider petitioner representation dated 17.11.2022 and to conduct an enquiry on the merits in accordance with law as against the Respondents 2 and 3 and dispose the same within time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Government Pleader for R1. .