VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Jeyajothi.S v. The Chief Educational Officer

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 November 2023
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 27938/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a Physical Education Teacher, who was working in the third respondent aided School challenging the order of suspension imposed upon her on 10.11.2023 on the ground that the said order is not backed by a School Committee resolution.

¶2Mr.E.V.N.Siva, learned Counsel takes notice for the respondents 3 to 5.

¶3The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 5 on instructions, submits that the respondents have decided to recall the order of suspension, dated 10.11.2023 and the charge memo, dated 11.11.2023 with liberty to proceed afresh in a manner known to law.

¶4In view of the above said facts, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present writ petition. The petitioner undertakes to report for duty tomorrow (28.11.2023). This writ petition stands closed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.

27.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The District Educational Officer (Secondary Grade), Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Secretary,

4.The Correspondent,

5.The Headmaster,

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

BTR

27.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)No.24040 of 2023 S.Jeyajothi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2.The District Educational Officer (Secondary Grade), Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3.The Secretary, 4.A.Ayyanar, Correspondent, 5.The Headmaster, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the third respondent vide his proceedings Nil, dated 10.11.2023 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.V.Om Prakash Government Advocate For R-3 to R-5 : Mr.E.V.N.Siva

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.