VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Azhagar v. The Commissioner of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 21339/2023

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to transfer the petitioner complaint in CSR No.493/2023 on the file of third respondent to any other Police Station within the jurisdiction of first respondent and expedite the enquiry under the direct supervision of first respondent.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case in Cr.No.994 of 2023 under Section 379 IPC was registered by the third respondent and no recovery has been made so far.

3.In view of the above said submission, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

27.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/ No PNM To

¶1The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

¶2The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Thilagar Thida ACP Office, Madurai City.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station (Crime), Madurai City.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.ILANGOVAN, J. PNM ORDER IN

27.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Azhagar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 2. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Thilagar Thida ACP Office, Madurai City. 3. The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station (Crime), Madurai City. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court, to direct R1 to transfer the petitioner complaint in CSR No. 493/2023 on the file of R3 to any other police station within the jurisdiction of R1 and expedite the enquiry under the direct supervision of R1. For Petitioner : Mr. B.Vinoth Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.