- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 27977/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2Considering the order to be passed, issuance of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.
¶3The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation dated 06.10.2022 and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The third respondent will put on notice all the interested parties including the private respondents herein before passing final order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the third respondent to pass order one way or the other.
¶4This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To
1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur Division, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Tahsildar, Vembakottai Taluk, Vembakottai, Virudhunagar District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.24085 of 2023
28.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.24085 of 2023 Seenivasagam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur Division, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Vembakottai Taluk, Vembakottai, Virudhunagar District. 4.Samuthiram 5.Muthu 6.Ramakrishnan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to take appropriate action in the cancellation of Patta No. 2573 in Subdivision S.No. 642/2A2 and to issue separate patta in respect of pathway property in S.No.642/2A to the extent of 1000 sq.feet as per the Sale Deed in Doc.No.763/1996 dated 23.01.1996 in favour of the petitioner within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.