- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 28023/2023
Judgment
ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that survey was conducted yesterday. Copy of the survey sketch has been served on the learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶2The first respondent is directed to serve the copy of the survey report on the petitioner through the local official. This shall be done immediately and without any delay.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
28.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The Tahsildar,
2.The Surveyor,
3.The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
28.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Subbaiah ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, 2.The Surveyor, 3.The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, 4.Kumar 5.Vanapetchi 6.Perumal Thevar @ Chinnakalai ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent No.1 and 2 herein to conduct survey and demarcate four boundaries in respect of the properties comprised in Sur. No.113/2 and 113/3 situated at Kanniyampatti village, Uthamapalayam taluk, Theni district with the aid of the 3rd respondent and issue survey report within a stipulated time period in accordance with law on the basis of the application dated 25.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 : Mr.J.Albert James Government Advocate for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.