Ganesan v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

28.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothkudi.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchendur Revenue Divisional Office, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Tahsildar, Eral Taluk Office, Eral, Thoothkudi District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

28.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothkudi. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchendur Revenue Divisional Office, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Tahsildar, Eral Taluk Office, Eral, Thoothkudi District. 4.Radha 5.Ramajeyam 6.Rajkumar 7.Ramkumar ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents no.1 to 3 to remove the names of respondents no. 4 to 9 in the Patta no. 865 issued for the property in Old Survey no. 824/1B in Survey no. 824/1B1A1A1 situated at Arulmugamangalam Village, Eral Taluk, Thoothukudi District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mandhiralingeswaran For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubraani Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3