- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 28633/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents.
2.The petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation to the first respondent. On receipt thereof, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The first respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, on notice before passing final order. It is open to the first respondent to pass order one way or the other.
3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
05.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
05.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Nagoor Kani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to take petitioners case on his file, conduct enquiry and dispose the case within the time stipulated by this Court on the basis of petitioners representation dated 05.10.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.