VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Paramasivan v. S.Navaneetha Krishnan

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 December 2023
Bench
K.Murali Shankarauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 3275/2023

Judgment

ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order in I.A.No.5 of 2023 in O.S.No.84 of 2024, dated 31.08.2023 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli, dismissing the petition filed under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C.

¶2The respondents 1 and 2 plaintiffs have filed the suit against the revision petitioner, claiming permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from making any construction in the first schedule property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from preventing the plaintiffs to use the plaint second schedule property. Pending suit, the first defendant has filed the above application, seeking to reject the plaint on the ground that the plaint does not disclose any cause of action.

¶3No doubt, it is settled law that the plaint can be rejected, if the plaint does not disclose any cause of action. But whether the cause of action alleged is true or not, is a matter for trial. The learned trial Judge, by observing that the plaintiffs have specifically alleged a cause of action and those factual aspects cannot be gone into at this stage, dismissed the petition.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the injunction cannot be claimed against co-owner. No doubt, it is a settled preposition of law, but that by itself, is not a ground for rejecting the plaint and hence, the impugned order dismissing the petition cannot be found fault with. Hence, this Court concludes that the Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶5Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs.

14.12.2023 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No das To

¶1The II Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.R.P.(MD)No.3275oofo2023 oK.MURALIoSHANKARoo,Jo. das Orderomadeoin C.R.P.(MD)No.3275oofo2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.16888oofo2023 Datedo:o14.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.12.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and C.M.P.(MD)No.16888 of 2023 A.Paramasivan : Petitioner/Petitioner 1st Defendant Vs. 1.S.Navaneetha Krishnan 2.N.Ramesh : Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs 3.G.Ravi : Respondent/Respondent/2nd Defendant Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.5 of 2023 in O.S.No.84 of 2024, dated 31.08.2023 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli. For Petitioner : Mr.KA.Ramakrishnan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.