VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sathyaraj v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 December 2023
Bench
V.Sivagnanamauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 21486/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05.12.2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble MR JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Sathyaraj

... Petitioner/Accused (Rank not known)

Vs The Inspector of Police, Eriodu Police Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.253 of 2023)

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman,

Additional Public Prosecutor.

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.253 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 IPC in Crime No.253 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that electric cable length about 90 meter was stolen from the agricultural land of the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that there is no overt act as against the petitioner and only based on the confession statement of A1, the petitioner herein was implicated as an accused. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the property was recovered from A2 and there is no previous case pending as against the petitioner herein.

5.On perusal of records, it is noticed that the petitioner herein was implicated in this case only based on the confession statement of A1 and property was not recovered from the petitioner herein. It is also noticed that there is no previous case pending as against the petitioner.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration of the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012)1 SCC 40, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [i] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandhur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that

(ii) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the trial Court on summons. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the CRLeOP(MD)No.21486eofe2023 learnedoMagistrate/TrialoCourtohimselfoasolaidodownobyotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourt inoP.K.Shajiovs.oStateoofoKeralao[(2005)AIRoSCWo5560]. [f]oIfotheoaccusedothereafteroabsconds,oaofreshoFIRocanobeoregisteredounder Sectiono229AoIPC. oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooosd/- ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooo05/12/2023 oooo ooooooooooo/oTRUEoCOPYo/ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooo/12/2023 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooSub-AssistantoRegistraro(C.S.ooo) ooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooMaduraioBenchoofoMadrasoHighoCourt, ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooMaduraio-o625o023.oo GNS TO 1oooTHEoJUDICIALoMAGISTRATE, VEDASANDHUR. 2oooDOoTHROUGHoTHEoCHIEFoJUDICIALoMAGISTRATE, DINDIGULoDISTRICT. 3oooTHEoINSPECTORoOFoPOLICE ERIODUoPOLICEoSTATION,oDINDIGULoDISTRICT. 4oooTHEoADDITIONALoPUBLICoPROSECUTOR, ooo MADURAIoBENCHoOFoMADRASoHIGHoCOURT, ooo MADURAI.o +1oCCotooM/s.T.LENINKUMAR,oAdvocateo(oSR-17296[I]odatedo05/12/2023o) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.21486 of 2023 Date :05/12/2023 SS/JGB/SAR- /14/12/2023/5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.