- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- R.Vijayakumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 28249/2023
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a Conductor of the respondent Transport Corporation seeking to dispose of his representation given to the respondents 1 and 2 herein for initiating action against the third respondent, who is a Checking Inspector.
¶2According to the learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the Checking Inspector with mala fide intention is passing on wrong information to the authorities, so that, he has been issued with a memo on two occasions. Hence, he seeks action as against the third respondent.
¶3It could be seen from the typed set of papers that every time when the petitioner was found to be defective not only the third respondent but also another Checking Inspector had accompanied him. Therefore, whether the third respondent had acted in mala fide intention or not could be found out only after the enquiry proceedings as against the writ petitioner are completed. Therefore, at this point of time, the respondents 1 and 2 cannot be directed to initiate action as against the third respondent herein.
¶4With the above said observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
30.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To
1.The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2.
2.The General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2.
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
BTR
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR D.Sundarsingh ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. 2.The General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. 3.N.Subbian ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to take action against the third respondent and consider the petitioner's representation, dated 09.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramakrishnan For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.