VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Palkani v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 28385/2023

Judgment

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.The fourth respondent herein had filed W.P(MD)No.24642 of 2023 for conducting survey of the petition mentioned lands. The writ petition was disposed of on 11.10.2023 with certain directions. Pursuant to the said order, the third respondent has issued notice to the writ petitioner. The writ petitioner is yet to offer her objections. The petitioner is given liberty to offer her objections. The third respondent is bound to consider the petitioner's objection and pass a specking order. If the third respondent overrules the petitioner's objections, he cannot conduct the survey immediately thereafter. He has to give a breathing time of six weeks to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to obtain any restraint order against conducting of survey. Since the petitioner's rights are adequately protected, I do not want to interfere with the impugned notice at this point of time.

3.Reiterating the directions earlier given, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

01.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, and W.M.P(MD)Nos.24425 & 24427 of 2023

01.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.24425 & 24427 of 2023 Palkani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, 3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, 4.R.Chandra ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the third respondent in his survey notice in F.L.A.No. 79 of 2023 dated 30.10.2023 and quash the same as devoid of merits and consequently set-aside the orders passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No. 24642 of 2023 dated 11.10.2023 which was obtained by the fourth respondent by abuse of process of law and suppression of fact. For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.Subbaiah for R.4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.