- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 28341/2023
Judgment
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
¶2The second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The second respondent will put on notice all the interested parties before passing final order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.
¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To
1.The Commissioner of Geology and Mining, Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
2.The Deputy Director of Geology and Mining, Collectorate Campus, Virudhunagar.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.24403 of 2023
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.24403 of 2023 S.Gururaja ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Geology and Mining, Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 2.The Deputy Director of Geology and Mining, Collectorate Campus, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the petitioner period of quarry lease for another 2 years inlieu of period of loss due to Corana Virus on the basis of his representation dated 21.08.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.