VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

L.Lourdusamy v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 November 2023
Bench
The Chief Justice, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 28315/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard Mr.J.Lawrance, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a notice under Section 131 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994, has been issued. The petitioner is in possession of his patta land. The authority could not have exercised the jurisdiction in respect of the patta land, inter alia, ought not have issued the impugned notice.

¶3We have also heard Mr.T.Amjad Khan, learned Government Advocate, for the respondents.

¶4If a notice under Section 131 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 has been issued and the encroachment has not been removed, the authority has to adopt the procedures as contemplated under Sections 7 and 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

¶5Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that the competent authority would issue notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

¶6In the light of that, naturally, on the basis of the impugned notice, no demolition would take place. In case, the authority issues notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, the petitioner will have every opportunity to file an explanation along with all the relevant documents, which will be considered by the authority, under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act.

¶7With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[S.V.G., .C.J.] [L.V.G., J.]

30.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To:

1.The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk, Vedasandur, Dindigul District.

2.The Block Development Officer, Vedasandur Panchayat Union, Vedasandur, Dindigul District. THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.24389 of 2023

30.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) No.24389 of 2023 L.Lourdusamy ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Tahsildar Vedasandur Taluk Vedasandur, Dindigul District 2.The Block Development Officer Vedasandur Panchayat Union Vedasandur, Dindigul District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.887/2020/Aa6, dated 20.11.2023 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.