- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 28413/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take necessary action upon the petitioners complaint dated 24.03.2023 which is pending before the 2nd respondent.
¶2Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, it is found that it is purely a business transaction between the parties. Therefore, by advising them to work out remedy through civil proceedings, the complaint was closed.
¶3In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, if the petitioner is aggrieved over the outcome of the enquiry, he can work out remedy through appropriate proceedings.
¶4With the liberty, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
04.12.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J
pnn Dated 04.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.12.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P(MD) No.28413 of 2023 Thangapandi Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take necessary action upon the petitioners complaint dated 24.03.2023 which is pending before the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Ramasamy For Respondents :Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Addl.Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.