B.Mekala v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The fourth respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the fourth respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.

¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

04.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

4.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

04.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN B.Mekala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 4th respondent to act upon the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in O.Mu.No. 1212838/2022/L.R.1 dated 11.08.2023 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2023 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Ilango For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan Additional Government Pleader