Sivanammal v. The Director

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.This writ petition has been filed because the petitioner apprehends that the corporation officials may demolish the front portion of her house. Even according to the petitioner, till date, no notice has been issued. The second respondent shall adhere to due process of law before taking any adverse action.

3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

05.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The Director, Tamil Nadu Urban Local, 100, Anna Salai, Border Garden, Padupaakam, Saithapet, Chennai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

05.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Sivanammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Tamil Nadu Urban Local, 100, Anna Salai, Border Garden, Padupaakam, Saithapet, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner, The Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2023 for making necessary steps to restraining the 2nd respondent to take illegal action upon her house which situated at south taluk RS 101/4 at door 29 BB road, Vengakadachala puram, Madurai, same as disposing with stipulated time as prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Moorthy For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Spl. Government Pleader for R1. Mrs.S.Devaseena, Standing Counsel for R2.