Vijayasankar v. The Senior Regional Manager

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed by a TASMAC Supervisor, challenging the order of suspension dated 27.07.2018 on the ground that the second respondent has no jurisdiction to pass such an order.

¶2The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents brings to the notice of this Court that, the petitioner was suspended on 27.07.2018. He was issued a Charge Memo, on 28.01.2019. The Enquiry Officer completed the enquiry and the report has been submitted to the second respondent on 06.04.2020. The second respondent is yet to pass final orders.

¶3Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶4Considering the above said facts, the second respondent herein is directed to pass final orders on the enquiry report dated 06.04.2020, on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶5With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

06.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To

¶1The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC) Limited, Trichy.

¶2The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC) Limited, Thanjavur District. R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi W.P(MD)No.28724 of 2023

06.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.28724 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD) Nos.24769 and 24770 of 2023 Vijayasankar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC) Limited, Trichy. 2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC) Limited, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in No.8092/2018/A-1, dated 27.07.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all continuation, service benefits and monetary benefits and to pay the arrears of subsistence allowance to the petitioner from 27.07.2018 till the date of reinstatement. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Navaneetharaja For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam Standing Counsel