Marimuthu v. The Government of India, Represented Through

O R D E R Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner seeks renewal of passport. The application was put on hold because of the involvement in a criminal case.

¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is clarified by the petitioner's counsel that the FIR was quashed vide order dated 08.12.2023 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.19920 of 2023.

¶4Now there is no impediment. The petitioner's passport shall be renewed by the first respondent subject to fulfilment of the other usual formalities. This writ petition stands allowed. No costs.

18.12.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.28754 OF 2023 To:

¶1The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Madurai, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Kenikarai police station, Ramanathapuram District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.28754 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.28754 of 2023

18.12.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.28754 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.28754 of 2023 Marimuthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Government of India, Rep. Through The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Madurai, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kenikarai police station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.805 of 2016) ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to reissue / renew the petitioner's passport in No. L8663026 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.10.2023 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik For R-1 : Mr.A.P.Rajasimman For R-2 : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.28754 OF 2023